Specifications
- Processor
- Intel® Core™ Ultra 7 270K Plus
- Code Name
- Arrow Lake (formerly)
- Vertical Segment
- Desktop
- Package Size
- 45 mm × 37.5 mm
- Socket Supported
- FCLGA1851
- Total Cores
- 24
- Performance‑cores
- 8
- Efficient‑cores
- 16
- Threads
- 24
- Base Frequency (P‑core)
- 3.7 GHz
- Base Frequency (E‑core)
- 3.2 GHz
- Max Turbo Frequency
- 5.5 GHz
- Performance‑core Max Turbo
- 5.4 GHz
- Efficient‑core Max Turbo
- 4.7 GHz
- Cache
- 36 MB Intel® Smart Cache
- Total L2 Cache
- 40 MB
- Processor Base Power
- 125 W
- Maximum Turbo Power
- 250 W
- Memory Types
- DDR5 up to 7200 MT/s
- Max Memory Size
- 256 GB
- Memory Channels
- 2
- ECC Memory Supported
- Yes
- Graphics Output
- eDP 1.4b, DP 2.1 UHBR20, HDMI 2.1 FRL
- Max Resolution (HDMI)
- 7680 × 4320 @ 60 Hz
- Max Resolution (DP)
- 7680 × 4320 @ 60 Hz
- Graphics Base Frequency
- 300 MHz
- Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
- 2 GHz
- Xe‑cores
- 4
- H.264 Encode/Decode
- Yes
- H.265 (HEVC) Encode/Decode
- Yes
- AV1 Encode/Decode
- Yes
- Intel® Quick Sync Video
- Yes
- NPU Name
- Intel® AI Boost
- Direct Media Interface Revision
- 4
- Thunderbolt 4
- Yes
- PCI Express Revision
- 5.0 and 4.0
- Max PCIe Lanes
- 24
- Intel® Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 Frequency
- 5.5 GHz
- Intel® Turbo Boost Technology
- 2.0
- Intel® Hyper‑Threading Technology
- No
What reviewers say

PCMag’s review praises the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus for its impressive 24‑core performance, especially in gaming when paired with a discrete GPU, and highlights its exceptionally low price point as a standout value. The article notes strong raw CPU power, solid integrated graphics, and overall robust multitasking capability, while acknowledging that low‑resolution/high‑frame‑rate gaming still falls behind AMD’s Ryzen X3D chips.
www.pcmag.com ↗
Tom’s Hardware reviews the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus as a CPU that has improved its gaming performance to be competitive in its price bracket, but still lags behind AMD’s 3D‑cache chips and newer Raptor Lake options. The article notes it is about 20% slower than the Ryzen 7 9800X3D in their test suite, though it outperforms Intel’s own Core Ultra 7 265K by roughly 10%. It highlights that the chip offers good value compared to higher‑priced Intel models and AMD alternatives, but acknowledges gaming remains its weak point.
www.tomshardware.com ↗
PC Gamer praises the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus as a standout desktop processor, noting its strong performance, competitive price, and all‑round capabilities while acknowledging that Ryzen X3D chips still edge it out in pure gaming, it can be somewhat power hungry, and the platform may not have a long future.
www.pcgamer.com ↗
Our take
Based on 3 reviews
All 3 reviews agree the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus delivers strong raw CPU power and multitasking capability, with PCMag and PC Gamer specifically highlighting its competitive pricing as a key value proposition. Tom's Hardware also notes it offers good value compared to higher-priced Intel models, confirming the broad consensus on its cost-effectiveness for general desktop use.
However, reviewers split on its gaming viability. While PCMag sees it as impressive for gaming with a discrete GPU, Tom's Hardware and PC Gamer both note it lags behind AMD’s Ryzen X3D chips, with Tom's Hardware measuring it as 20% slower than the Ryzen 7 9800X3D. This means buyers prioritizing pure gaming performance should look elsewhere, while those seeking balanced productivity and value will find it suitable.
Pros
- Strong raw CPU power
- Competitive pricing
- Solid integrated graphics
- Robust multitasking capability
Cons
- Lags behind AMD Ryzen X3D in gaming
- Can be power hungry
- Platform may lack long-term future
Best for: Desktop users seeking balanced productivity and value; pure gamers should consider AMD Ryzen X3D alternatives.




Comments