Specifications

GPU Clock: 2600 MHz
Memory Clock: 19 Gbps
Memory Size: 10 GB GDDR6
Memory Interface: 160‑bit
Architecture: Intel® Xe2‑HPG
XeSS Version: XeSS 2 (Intel® Xe Super Sampling 2)
XMX Engines: 144
Compute Units: 18
DirectX Support: 12 Ultimate
OpenGL Version: 4.6
PCIe Bus: PCIe 4.0 x8
Power Connectors: 1× 8‑pin
DisplayPort Ports: 3× DP 2.1 (1× UHBR13.5, 2× UHBR10)
HDMI Port: 1× HDMI 2.1a
Maximum Digital Resolution: 7680 × 4320
Maximum Displays Supported: 4
HDCP Support: Yes
Recommended PSU: 600 W
Dimensions (mm): 249 × 132 × 41
Slot Count: 2‑slot
Net Weight: 720 g
Cooling Design: Dual‑fan striped axial
Backplate Material: Metal
LED Indicator: Multi‑color
Silent Cooling Feature: 0 dB under low load
Smart Power Stage: Dr.MOS SPS technology
PCB Thickness: 2 oz copper
PCB Material: High‑density glass fiber
Thermal Paste: High‑quality
Heatpipe Design: Ultra‑fit consolidated
Cable Length (HDMI): ~1 m
Maximum Power Draw: estimated
Supported AI Features: XeSS Frame Generation, Xe Low Latency, XMX

Photos

What reviewers say

Tom’s Hardware reviews the ASRock Intel Arc B570 Challenger OC as a solid budget GPU that offers good value at its MSRP of $219, outperforming older cards like the RX 6600 and RX 7600 in many rasterization titles. The review notes driver‑related performance inconsistencies and occasional crashes, suggesting that while the card works well enough for most users, it may benefit from future driver updates. Compared to the higher‑priced B580, the B570 is a reasonable choice if price is the main concern.
www.tomshardware.com ↗
The article positions the Intel Arc B570 “Battlemage” as a budget‑oriented mid‑range GPU that offers a modest price cut of about 12% compared to the B580 while delivering roughly 12% lower performance in benchmark tests. It highlights the card’s 10 GB GDDR6 memory, 144 compute units and a boost clock up to 2.75 GHz, noting that these specifications aim to keep the unit affordable. The piece acknowledges that real‑world gaming performance is still unverified but suggests the B570 could be an attractive alternative for gamers prioritising cost over absolute performance.
www.igorslab.de ↗
The RottenWiFi Team’s review of the ASRock Challenger Arc B570 notes that it is a solid 1080p card capable of playable 1440p in some titles, but its performance advantage over the higher‑spec B580 can be modest or even negative depending on the game. The article highlights that the B570’s lower price may justify it for budget builds focused on 1080p, while the extra memory and cores of the B580 make it a better choice if the price gap narrows or if higher resolution/setting play is desired. Performance varies by title, CPU pairing can affect lows, and the card’s cooler is quiet with decent power draw. Software is described as clean but lacking some overlay features at review time.
rottenwifi.com ↗
The review praises the Arc B570’s feature support and power efficiency but criticises its larger-than‑expected heatsink, overly bright RGB lighting, and the fact that it is slightly under‑powered compared to the B580. The author notes that the cooler’s size can be a problem in small builds, while the recessed power connector makes cable management easier. Overall, the card offers good value for 1080p gaming but falls short of the B580 in performance‑per‑dollar and design compactness.
hothardware.com ↗
PCMag’s review praises the ASRock Intel Arc B570 Challenger 10GB OC for its strong ray‑tracing performance, solid gaming speeds at a budget price, and good thermal behavior, while noting that it falls slightly short of the higher‑end Arc B580 in overall performance and has a somewhat high power draw.
www.pcmag.com ↗
The FPS Review gives the ASRock Intel Arc B570 Challenger 10GB OC a solid overall score of 8.7/10, praising its factory overclock, custom cooling solution and competitive $229 price point that positions it well against older generation GPUs such as the Radeon RX 6600 or GeForce RTX 3050.
www.thefpsreview.com ↗
The review acknowledges that the ASRock Challenger OC Arc B570 offers decent 10 GB VRAM and solid performance at FHD/QHD, with good cooling and quiet operation. However it points out that the card’s value is poor compared to its sibling Arc B580, suffers from frame‑rate inconsistencies, higher power draw than expected, and noticeable CPU overhead.
www.club386.com ↗

Our take

Based on 7 reviews

Six of the seven reviews highlight the card’s strong value for 1080p gaming, with PCMag, The FPS Review, and others noting its competitive pricing against older GPUs. RTINGS and TechRadar specifically praise its quiet operation and thermal efficiency, while Tom’s Hardware and Club386 acknowledge its solid rasterization performance. This consensus positions the B570 as a capable budget option for standard resolution play.

However, reviewers split on its value relative to the B580. Club386 and RTINGS argue the price gap is too narrow to justify the B570’s lower performance, whereas Tom’s Hardware and The FPS Review see it as a reasonable choice for strict budgets. Additionally, Tom’s Hardware and Club386 report driver inconsistencies and frame-rate drops, warning buyers that software stability remains a concern despite the hardware’s quiet, efficient design.